|
1997-2006 Academic Years Mechanics: Miscellaneous |
![]() |
30 September 1997: The first presentation was made by John Bozovsky [Bowen HS], featuring a virtuoso performance by Ernest the Dancing Bear. Ernest avidly rode his bicycle back and forth on a rope that was held at the ends and moved up and down by two people. As a variation, a "spit motor" [i.e. rotisserie motor for a barbeque grill] was outfitted with a rotating arm at one end of the rope, the other end being clamped in a fixed position. It was the judgment of the group that the device needed a longer arm, a shorter span, and a faster motor, and there was elaborate discussion of these points.
It must have been "science" as it did not work as expected. Ernest would not respond as he should or was expected to. Ernest is a bear doll sitting on a motorcycle with his feet permanently attached to the pulley with two balancing bars that are to keep him balanced on a wire. The problem is that there was too much friction mainly due to the cloth of the bear's pants.
- The setup that failed
The arm on the motor was about 10cm long
It failed; probably due to these effects:
The pulley on the road being lifted and dropped is to move the toy on the pulley
14 October 1997: Bill Blunk [Joliet Central High School]
He described a Force Stick, available from the Science Kit
Catalog
[http://sciencekit.com/] as item #
45444
for $13.75. The device reads force, and it has a sliding sleeve that
records the
"maximum force". It is calibrated for acceleration by attaching a
standard mass to it. It is rather more portable and user-friendly than
the usual
"accelerometer", and much more durable. He tested it by dropping it
with a "suction cup bottom" attached, and looking for the maximum
displacement, and also with a "super ball bottom". It seemed that in
the second case the maximum force [acceleration] was about twice as
large as in
the first case. The device also properly recorded centripetal
acceleration
as inward bound.
27 October 1998: John Bozovsky [Bowen HS]
He passed out a cardboard fish and cut a slot from the center through
the tail.
He placed in a dish of water and place a drop of "Fish Go" in the slot
and the fish was propelled by the substance exiting the slot in the
tail. The
"Fish Go" fuel turned out to be Three-in-one machine oil, and the fish
was propelled because of Newton's Third Law, like a rocket.
02 February 1999: Alex Junievicz [CPS Substitute]
He showed the only good pot-hole. The problem is with a wheel to try to
get out
of the pothole Speed is the first thought, but actually there is less
movement
as the speed is increased---the only way is rock--getting momentum.
He also showed a give-away that had a front surfaced mirror and behind is a regular mirror....Every second reflection can be noticed by the brightness-color of the image. First showing the sandwich covered by a box, and removing the box and still seeing the progression of the image still being the same. Another sterling way is showing it by holding it in front of the body.
Another comment was that a math teacher allegedly got severe eye damage at Juarez HS because a student pointed a laser at her eye.
02 February 1999: Cynthia D'Souza [DeLaSalle High School]
She worked on a NSF project during summer
Pre-Lab
After Lab
Loop
She had several stations that had a ramp of at least 30 cm high and had at least 20cm of table on which the ball rolled. A photo-gate that was attached to a computer that was programmed to measure the time the ball obscured that photo-gate and calculate with the known diameter of the ball and respond with the velocity of the ball just before it left the table.
One problem was that the steel ball provided had a tendency of bouncing as it rolled on the table. Another problem was noted by the receptor of the ball that had some height. Still another problem was where to measure to the cup which the rules indicated the ball should not touch the sides. One group substituted the given steel ball with one of the Happy-Sad type balls.
Knowing the velocity of the ball leaving the table, it was simple to compute the time that the ball took to fall the distance from the table down to the top of the can and then knowing the time, calculate the distance laterally that the ball would travel till it hit the cup
More about this in the future.
02 March 1999: Walter O McDonald [CPS Substitute]
He brought in an manipulative he purchased at Robot World in the
Wisconsin
Dells.
It was a little difficult to see why the figure was called "Moons of Jupiter" because it was a pendulum driven by a battery mechanism. In the base there is a driver coil activated by a transistor keyed by another sensing coil. When a magnet passes the pickup coil, thus triggering a power pulse (in the coil this causes a magnetic pulse) pushing away the magnet in the pendulum.
The main pendulum is on the stand and there are attached to the pendulum two other sets of balls that rotate on their own pivot pulse. As the pendulum swings the smaller set of balls on each side of the pendulum would spin in a chaotic-appearing form.
Discussions of rotational and frequency formulas were noted. The period seemed to be about 1.4 seconds and trial of stopping the secondary ball seemed to indicate the additional movement caused the main pendulum to have less amplitude as the secondary balls were active.
Porter commented that Chaos [http://www.physics.orst.edu/~rubin/nacphy/JAVA_pend/CHAOS/] can occur only when there are at least three degrees of freedom. For our case, we have the motion of the main pendulum, the oscillation of the weights on the right side, and the motion of the other set on the left side. The balls on the left were affected by a magnet reacting with the set on the right.
We did not see why it was sold with the Jupiter name, but Jupiter is often used by NASA as a way to "sling-shot" satellites on into outer space. See the website http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf4-1.html and http://www.thelearningkid.com/Learning/Physics.htm [click on lite gravity].
16 March 1999: Louis Harmon [ST Barbara HS]
She teaches at a girl's school, and has a small class and can do more
advanced
subjects. She showed a way of teaching addition of vectors (girls
school - Jump
ropes and a scooter {an item from the gym that has 4 wheels - maybe to
drag
equipment in the gym} someone sits on the wheels and with 2 jump
ropes are
pulled so the resultant can be seen.. Another way of changing friction
was to
move around in the gym with shoes, socks, and barefoot.
06 April 1999: Earl Zwicker [IIT, retired]
He produced a box postmarked 07 January 1982, sent to him by Harold
Jensen,
Professor of Physics from Lake Forest College and Chicago Area Physics
Guru.
Inside the box was a perpetual motion machine, in which a magnetic top
would
spin on a relatively rough surface, and run "for as long as you like"
without stopping. [The device had been ordered from a Johnson-Smith
Catalog;
they are still being published! http://www.johnsonsmith.com/]
Earl raised the question "how does it work?". He also produced a similar device out of the SMILE office, in which a "whirly-gig" actually picked up speed as it rotated while moving along a track. How can you disprove that these devices are true perpetual motion machines without taking them apart?
04 May 1999: Earnest Garrison [Chicago Vocational High School]
He brought in a hi-tech Yo-Yo. How could an old thing as yo-yo
be made
high tech? The answer to the new yo- yo's is that they have a clutch
operated by
a speed regulator that allows you to "walk the the dog", and when the
speed drops the clutch engages and up comes the yo-yo. Also as a
hi-tech
feature, they have lights that flash and a sound that is made; some
even depend
on speed. It is surprising that such an old concept is still enticing
the youth.
Porter made a comment about the yo-yo variation called the diabolo, which consists of two sticks and a string with which you spin a spool of a certain size and weight. Once you get it to spin fast enough you can throw it in the air, and if you are good [like me! -PJ] you can catch it back on the string! Amazing, but not impossible! The game was invented by the Chinese over 2000 years ago, and brought to Europe by French and English expeditions, and given the name diabollo [ancient Greek, "through throw"]. Pictures and details can be found on the following webpage: http://www.juggling.org/help/circus-arts/diabolo
07 December 1999: Arlyn Van Ek (Illiana Christian HS)
showed us a beautiful bird, made of wood, from Costa Rica. Its wingspan
was
about 2.5 ft, and its wings and body (separate parts) were suspended by
strings
from a wooden rod. When Arlyn gently moved the bird up and
down, he could
- by timing the motion correctly - cause its wings to "flap" up and
down on each side of the body. He then held the rod still while the
motion
continued and gradually died out. "What physics is involved in this?"
is the kind of question Arlyn asked. Some answers we made:
11 April 2000: Bill Blunk (Joliet Central HS)
had his miniature video camera connected to the big TV in front of us,
and he
placed a black cube-shaped device (about 2 cm on a side) mounted on a
flat metal
plate (about 6 cm x 15 cm) on the table. Then he told us about a
kindred cross
country skier, Bert Kleerum [Eagle River Nordic Skis] and their
interest
in measuring accelerations encountered in skiing. This has never been
done
before. They are trying to find a way to do this, and the black cube is
an
accelerometer used to measure and control airbag deployment. Obtainable
through David
Vernier [a premier supplier of sensors and electronic displayers
and
recorders for physics teachers - see any physics teacher on this, or
else check
the website http://www.vernier.com),
and
capable of +/- 5g, a very useful range. Bill showed us his Palm
Pilot, a
pocket size device with a graphic display and capable of recording much
data. He
focused his video camera on its display, so we could see it quite
clearly on the
large TV. Another device, which plugs into the Palm Pilot, is
made by Imagiworks
http://www.imagiworks.com, and
Bill
plugged the black cube accelerometer into it in turn.
Earl Zwicker gave Bill a hand by moving the accelerometer in various ways: circle, back-and-forth linearly, up-and-down linearly, accelerate and stop linearly - in opposite directions. Each of these motions resulted in a graphical display which we easily saw on the large TV, as Bill held the video camera focused on the Palm Pilot. (Which of the motions looked like a sine wave?) It is more compact than TI-CBL, with greater memory. And the Palm Pilot easily dumps its data into a PC to be analyzed by EXCEL. Now - the skier would carry the Palm Pilot in his jacket, connected to the accelerometer mounted on a ski, to record the physics of the ski's motion.
But - Bill still needs to find a way to record position as the skier moves along. This might be done with a permanent magnet under the snow, with a pick-up coil on a ski. The motion of the coil-on-the-ski through the field of the magnet would result in an electromagnetic induced pulse or "blip" to be recorded by the Palm Pilot on top of the acceleration data. Bill had a strip of refrigerator magnet material which could be placed under the snow, but a pick-up coil of about 200 turns of no. 26 wire did not produce a sufficiently strong signal. What to do? Any ideas? Could the difficulty be caused by an impedance mis-match between pick-up coil and the Imagiworks gadget? Let Bill know if you have an idea that might work. Terrific, Bill! Keep us informed!
Post-hypnotic thought/suggestion by PJ: What about just hooking up a GPS device to the calculator, and have it record the position? You can set it for "relative" position, relative to the starting point, and it is pretty accurate on that basis. But, is it accurate enough??
02 May 2000: Janet Sheard (West School, Glencoe)
showed us Build It, Move It, a kit on Force and Motion (ETA
catalogs)/
4th grade. She said the materials could be adopted to a wide range of
levels.
The inexpensive but effective apparatus came in a plastic storage box.
Many
investigations into forces: What are they? Sources of? Motion,
Friction,
Inertia, Machines. Janet had not yet used the kit, and we ran out of
time, but
maybe Janet will show us how some of it works next Fall. Essentially
"Physics for Every Kid." Inspiring!
23 April 2002: Fred Schaal (Lane Tech HS Mathematics) --
Top-ological Theory and Planetary
Lineups
Fred dealt with "top"-ology at an extremely applied level,
showing a
molded plastic top that has a smooth curved bottom, with a projecting
shaft on
top. Holding the top by its stem, Fred set it spinning
about its axis of symmetry
with its bottom on the table. To the amazement of many of us, the top
turned
itself over, so that it was spinning on its stem! How come?
Fred also showed us that the top would
initially rotate "upside down" when set into motion in that
orientation, and would stay that way. This physics toy, which is
called a
"tippy top", has identical moments of inertia about directions
perpendicular to its symmetry axis. The top continues to rotate in the
same
sense when its flips, so that the angular momentum of the top does not
change
direction. This is different from the "rattleback",
which has three different moments of inertia, and for which the
direction of
rotation may change. For details concerning the tippy top, see
the CERN
outreach website
http://outreach.web.cern.ch/outreach/public/nl/physics_fair/Exp36.html
and especially the American Physical Society page
http://www.aps.org/units/fed/newsletters/fall2001/kamishina.cfm,
which contains the following excerpt:
"Among a variety of tops, a tippy top is most popular. At a glance, a tippy top is hardly distinguishable from normal tops. A top usually rotates steadily around the rotational axis and the rotational axis rotates around the vertical axis as everyone knows. However a tippy top turns upside down while rotating.
at rest--- rotating
(Images courtesy of http://www.aps.org/units/fed/newsletters/fall2001/images/). The big difference between them is that the usual top falls down when at rest while a tippy top doesn't. It is stable at rest. This means that the center of mass of a conventional top is situated higher and it is therefore unstable at rest, while on a tippy top the center of motion is at the lowest position at rest. Roughly speaking, rotational motion progressively lifts the center of mass of a tippy top, and finally turns it over. The mechanism by which the axis of rotation gradually moves up or down in addition to a precession, moving in a circular cone about the vertical axis, is in large part connected with the action of friction at the point of contact with the floor.""The quantitative explanation of this mechanism is too difficult for students to understand. The qualitative explanation is more suitable for children. To reproduce the motion of a tippy top, I showed a 2-dimensional tippy top consisting of a large ring and a small ring both made of metal wire The two rings are attached at a point with the small ring inside the large one on the same plane. The role of the smaller ring is to shift the center of mass of the system away from the center of the large ring. When you rotate the large ring around the vertical axis connecting two centers of both rings with the small ring at the bottom, the system acts like a tippy top. While when you do the same thing but with the small ring at the top it acts like a conventional top. The difference in behavior is the position of the center of mass of the system."
Fred also alerted us to the fact that the planets Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, Venus, and Mercury are aligned in the Western sky just after dusk. For the next two months, 8:30 pm is about the best viewing time For details see http://www.adlerplanetarium.org/index.shtml. If you miss this planetary display, you can catch it again for a repeat performance in about 40 years! Thanks, Fred!
23 April 2002: Bill Blunk (Joliet Central HS Physics) -- May the
Force be Wilber!
Bill set up a Wilberforce Pendulum [mentioned at the last
SMILE meeting], in which there are two degrees of freedom,
corresponding to
"up-down" motion of the mass suspended by a spring, as well as its
"torsional" motion.
When he started the pendulum in an
"up-down motion", its motion gradually became torsional, and then went
on to switch slowly but steadily back and forth between "up-down" and
"torsional" motions. How come? Bill assured
us
that, since April Fool's Day has passed, this was not a trick, and
showed us
that there was nothing up his sleeve. We discussed the
matter at
length. A vibrating system with two degrees of freedom with
normal modes
lying at slightly different frequencies will execute periodic motion
only for
very specific initial initial conditions. Otherwise, one observes
"beats" between the two normal modes, in the same spirit as two tuning
forks of slightly different frequencies. There is coupling
between
"up-down" and "torsional" motions in this case, so that
neither of these motions corresponds to a normal mode of the system, as
one
might think. We decided to look for this coupling in the
"static" case in which the mass was not moving, making for slightly
different values of the suspended mass. To our surprise, the
equilibrium
position of the marker on the mass could be seen to rotate as the
suspended mass
was slightly changed.
You no longer have to beware the dark slide, Bill!
21 October 2003:
Wanda Pitts [Douglas Elementary
School Inertia
Challenges
Wanda let us through the following exercises to illustrate the
concept of
inertia:
Ken Schug added another example involving inertia, using a roll of toilet paper. With a slow pull the paper rolls, whereas with a fast pull one piece detaches. Place an object on the end of the toilet paper on a flat surface, and then pull slowly (object travels with paper) or rapidly (paper detaches). Note that, as weight of object is increased, the paper eventually will detach, with even a slow pull.
We all had fun and learned a lot! Thanks, Wanda.
18 November 2003: Karlene Joseph [Lane Tech Park,
physics]
Launching Your Marbles
Karlene showed us an inquiry-based learning exercise obtained from
her
colleague Brian Scane. She passed around paper bowls and
plates, as
well as marbles. Karlene asked us to put a marble in the bowl,
and make
the marble move in a circle within the bowl. After some practice, most
of us were
able to make the marble go around in the bowl, although if the marble
left the
dish, it appeared to move oddly. In particular, when the marble left
the bowl it moved in
a straight path, even though its motion had been roughly circular
before its
departure. We also tried the same exercise with a paper
plate. It
was much more difficult to get the marble to stay on the plate.
Finally,
she asked us to cut one quadrant out of the plate, and predict how
the
marble would move when it left the plate after making three-quarters of
a
revolution. Good physics insights, Karlene!
09 December 2003: Don Kanner (Lane Tech HS Physics
Teacher) Forces
Don had a modified version of Gary
Guzdziol's vacuum
disk [mp111803.html].
By reducing the internal plastic disk's diameter,
it was used as a washer for a nut on the end of an eyebolt to which a
heavy cord was attached. Without the worry of
string breaking, Don appeared to lift a stool with the device
but left us wondering
which force really lifted the
stool.
Don also posed the challenge of how to get all the marbles to stay on a paper plate when the plate is rotated, as an extension of the lesson given by Karlene Joseph at the last SMILE meeting [mp120203.html]. Go for it, Don --- you're on a roll!
09 March 2004: Walter McDonald [CPS Substitute -- V A
Technician] Questions
that Involve Sailing
Walter posed some questions that involved determining the direction
of
motion of a sailboat, when the directions of the wind velocity and the
water
current, as well as the orientation of the boat and location of the
sails, were
specified. These questions appeared as exercises 877-980
(questions on p
303; answers on p 402) in the innovative book 1000 Play
Thinks: Games of Art, Science, and Mathematics by Ivan
Moscovitch
[http://www.zephyrpress.com/].
Roy Coleman mentioned this book in the
Math-Physics SMILE class of 24 September 2002:
mp092402.html.
Here
is a brief paraphrased sample of questions and answers:
| Question: | Answer: |
| If you are sailing downwind in a 40 km/hr breeze, with your sail making a 90° angle with the keel of the boat, what is the fastest speed you can achieve? | Less than 40 km/hr. At that speed, the sails sag, as they would on a windless day. |
| If you are sailing downwind in a 40 km/hr breeze, with your sail making an angle of less than 90° with the keel of the boat, what is the fastest speed you can achieve? | Less than before, since the sail catches less wind, and the force on the sails is not in the direction of motion of the boat. |
| If you are sailing crosswind in a 40 km/hr breeze, with your sail making an angle of less than 90° with the keel of the boat. Can you sail faster than in a tailwind? | Yes, since the sail does not catch up with the wind, as in the first case. |
| How do you get a boat to move forward during a headwind? | By tacking, or sailing on a zigzag course at an angle to the direction from which the headwind is coming, with the sails opened to catch the wind. |
From now on, it will be smooth sailing for all of us. Very good, Walter!
23 March 2004:
Wanda Pitts [Douglas
School]
Spinners
Wanda began this lesson on Physical Chemistry by asking us
about
inertia. We pointed out that inertia is the tendency of an object
to
resist a change in its motion. Next she placed a
raw egg on the table, and let it sit for several seconds. Then,
she gave
the egg a gentle spin, and measured the time for it to
come to rest. We repeated this experiment for several trials with
the raw egg. Then,
we repeated the experiment with a boiled egg. Here are some data
obtained
for the two cases:
| Case | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 4 | Average |
| raw egg | 8 sec | 7 sec | 4 sec | 4 sec | 5.25 sec |
| boiled egg | 13 sec | 14 sec | 15 sec | 12 sec | 13.5 sec |
26 April 2005:
Terri Donatello [ST Edwards
School]
Rolling Uphill + Giveaways
Terry brought in an apparatus that seemed to show an object rolling
uphill. The object is a double cone (solid wood) that rolls on a pair
of wooden rails, which are pitched slightly uphill as they widen. The
cone seems to move ''uphill", because it rolls "up" the rails. It does
so, because as the rails widen, the center of mass of the cone actually
gets lower, as more of the cone falls below the level of the rails.
Terri then showed us how the "scratch test" is used to characterize the hardness of a mineral; this is one test used to identify an unknown mineral. Also, minerals will cleave in characteristic ways (depending on the forces that hold them together). For example, mica will cleave to form flat sheets ("isinglass"; see http://www.answers.com/topic/isinglass}, that were, at one time, used for windowpanes. The shapes of their crystals also are useful characteristics of minerals; NaCl, for example, forms a nice cubic crystal.
The Cell Game! This was a board game designed to teach the parts of a living cell, which Terri described as a "real treasure". And there were lots of other treasures that Terri brought that she has used to teach almost every area of science over the years. She offered them to the class members to take with them and use in their classrooms!
Terri, thanks for everything!
04 October 2005: Charlotte Wood-Harrington (Gwendolyn Brooks HS,
physics)
Kinetics Problem
Charlotte then talked about slopes and teaching slopes.
Four volunteers each held a piece of
PVC pipe about 8 cm in diameter that had been sliced
in half lengthwise to produce
troughs about 50 cm long. The team then was charged with
producing a ramp that could roll a big super-ball into a tin can. This
allowed the team to work together to adjust the slope of the four piece
ramp to modify the speeds of the passage of the ball down the ramp.
Eventually they got the ball into the can. Neat ideas!
Thanks,
Charlotte.
01 November 2005: Terry Donatello (Weber HS,
retired)
Distribution of Forces
Terry
also showed a demonstration of the "distribution of forces"
(exercise 168 from the Giant Book of Science
Experiments: http://boreal.com/category.asp_Q_c_E_536130).
She used a piece of string wrapped around the hand. It is a principle
that is important in understanding how pulleys work, in which a force
can be distributed into equal half portions to two branches of a loop
of rope or string. She gave
each of us a string, and we soon were testing the idea. It
worked!