|
1997-2006 Academic Years Teaching Pedagogy |
27 October 1998: Ann Brandon [Joliet West HS]
She reviewed the difference between Scalars and Vectors.
She asked which of the following are vectors (V) or scalars (S):
Distance: (S)
Displacement:(V)
Speed:(S)
Velocity:(V)
Acceleration:(V)
She also showed a game in which velocity vectors are illustrated. There was a sort of maze through which two players should travel in a race without hitting the walls. They could change the x- and y-components of velocity by only one unit from the previous move. The winner goes through in the least number of moves without hitting the wall.
10 November 1998: Alex Junievicz [CPS Substitute]
He made 2 comments, First he brought a maze that helps get the
difference between Distance/Displacement across. Find the route through
the maze, measure it in meters (expand the relationship of cm to m) and
the figure out the displacement (direct vector route) in meters and
direction. remember North is zero...or use the meteorological ESE
East-South-North-West, etc.
Second, he mentioned a way of keeping electrical meters from being destroyed. By placing at least 2 silicon diodes in opposite directions across the movement, thus the voltage should not exceed 0.6 V saving the meter. if 0.6 V affects the full scale readings, 2 can be put in series--1.2 V. Another device used for protection is the neon bulb which fires at about 90 V depending upon ambient light.
06 April 1999: Karlene Joseph [Lane Tech HS]
She asked the question: How do you get a balloon completely inside a
500 cc Florence Flask? The students in her class had various opinions,
which were interesting to consider from the viewpoint of basic physics
and "common sense". She then got a balloon to go inside by putting a
little water [" 50 cc] inside the flask, and boiling away most of it.
Then, she took the flask off the heating element and put the balloon
around the lip of the flask. After a few seconds the balloon was pulled
inside the flask, and as more of the water vapor condensed the balloon
filled up with air. Verrrrrrry interesting!
Next she demonstrated an OCARINA, which she had obtained from the craft store at Berea College in Berea, Kentucky [Latitude: 37o 34.2', Longitude: 84o 17.6']. She played on octave on the instrument, and then asked how to explain the sounds from the size and shape of the holes. Of course, nobody knew!
Addition information has been obtained by Lilla Green [Hartigan School]
I was in TN for some years and know a little about the Ocarina. It is sometimes referred to as a "globular flute." I think it is actually a very ancient instrument, although many cultures have embraced it and put their own touches to it. I think it originated with Native Americans, who made them out of clay. Now, they are made from wood or Terra Cotta or even plastic. They are made in all kinds of shapes, like animals or faces. The "sweet potato" Ocarina is also common (It's just shaped like a blob basically). I have seen them in antique stores and little gift shops, but I have never heard one played. If I were to guess, though I would say the physics is very similar to the flute or recorder, where you blow in and change the frequency that comes out by obstructing various outlets.
--Aubrey T. Hanbicki; The James Franck Institute; University of Chicago
Also, see following websites: http://www.ocarina.co.uk/.
02 February 1999: Bill Colson [Morgan Park HS]
How is it possible to suck spaghetti into your mouth?
The audience experienced the phenomenon with samples of foul-tasting pseudo-spaghetti, and drew these conclusions:
There is a pressure difference and the spaghetti will enter the mouth because the friction of the spaghetti will allow the spaghetti to be pushed by the pressure difference toward the lower pressure inside region.
See Readers Digest for January 1999.
01 February 2000: John Scavo (Richards Career Academy)
(handout - see http://www.ed.gov/pubs/parents/Science/soap.html)
placed a pan on the table and filled it half full of water. Then he cut
a small boat shape (about 5 cm long) from an index card. After using a
paper punch to make a hole at the center of the boat, he used scissors
to cut a narrow slot from the back of the boat to the hole - making a
"keyhole" in it. We gathered around to see him place the boat on the
water, and then he squeezed one drop of dishwashing soap into the hole,
and the boat was rapidly propelled from one end of the pan to the
other! A soap-powered boat! Actually, the soap reduces the surface
tension of the water at the back of the boat, and the surface tension
forces on the boat become unbalanced, propelling it. Neat!
14 March 2000: Bill Blunk (Joliet Central HS)
set up the Millikan Oil Drop Experiment on the table. It is a
dandy piece of equipment sold by Sargent Welch, and expensive,
so his school could afford only one, Bill explained. So when he sets it
up for his students, only one at a time can look through the telescope
to see the oil drop(s).
He then showed us a new addition to his technology - a small video camera that he had bought for $90 at the ISPP meeting at New Trier HS. (It's the sort of thing being used on computers these days when people are "talking" to each other.) It was now connected to a large TV set in front of us, and when Bill aimed the camera at us, we could see ourselves on the TV.
He reviewed for us how the Millikan Oil Drop Experiment [http://www.daedalon.com/oildrop.html] works; a pair of horizontal, parallel conducting plates are placed about 1 cm apart, and an electric harge is placed on them. Then some "oil drops" are squirted into the space between them (using an atomizer with a hollow needle such as for inflating a basketball).
Some of the drops become charged and may have 1, 2, 3, etc electrons on them. (Millikan used oil drops because he found small water drops evaporate rapidly, oil drops don't.) With the aid of a dandy diagram on the board which showed a charged sphere and a rod nearby, Bill showed us how opposite charges attract and repel. He used colorful magnets that had the + and - charge signs on them. They stuck to the board on the diagram and Bill could move them around to show how charges respond to each other -- a la Bill Shanks.
Bill Blunk also explained that nowadays fairly uniform latex spheres averaging 913 nm in diameter and carried by water drops from the atomizer are what he squirts into the space between the plates. A sphere (drop) with one electron negative charge would be attracted toward the upper positively charged plate. If a drop had 2 electrons and twice the negative charge (assuming they are all alike), then it would move twice as fast. By observing the motion of the drops through the telescope against a reticule (grid), one could calculate their speeds.
At this point, Bill placed the video camera to "look" right into the telescope, and we could then see the drops on the TV screen! With the voltage off (no charge) the drops would gradually move upward (which was really down, since the telescope inverts the image) under gravity. But with the voltage on, some would move down (actually, up, as seen on the TV!). But they moved with different speeds, and the differences between their speeds was always the same amount, which means that the electron charges on the drops always differed by the same amount. Bill could now show this to the entire class at once with the aid of his new video camera. Great! And it is affordable!
11 April 2000: Carl Martikean (Wallace HS, Gary, IN)
placed a capped jar with a greenish liquid in it on the table, then
wrote on the board: Pediculus humanus capitus. "Does anyone
know that this is?" he asked, referring to the writing. One person
raised her hand. "What's the answer?" asked Carl. To which she replied,
"Head lice!" And Carl said, "Right! Head lice!" Carl said that the
liquid in the jar was sewer water, and twisted off the cap. Then he
opened a plastic bag that he said contained new insects that live in
sewers, and dumped some into the jar of sewer water. "Just look!" Carl
said, pointing to the jar. "They come to life almost immediately!" --
as the particles moved up and down in the jar. "Would anybody like to
drink some of this?" asked Carl. With no volunteers, Carl said, "OK -
I'll drink some myself!" - and much to our disgust and astonishment -
he did! "More?" asked Carl. And then he drank down half the jar. Of
course, by now most of us guessed it was a fake. Carl explained that
the "sewer water" was really a mix of ginger ale (for carbonation) and Frosh
(a soft drink for green color). The "insects" from the plastic bag were
really dried currants. "Kids will believe almost anything you tell
them," Carl said. He explained that he wants his students to question
him (and what they see on TV and elsewhere) about everything, and this
is one way he tries to make skeptics of them.
05 September 2000 Don Kanner (Lane Tech HS)
showed us Galileo's inclined plane experiment. Galileo used a source of
water drops as a clock (equal time intervals between drips) in order to
time how long it took for an object to move down a plane inclined at a
measured angle above the vertical. To have calibrate elapsed time, one
would measure the amount of water collected in 10 seconds. One would do
this for increasing angles of inclination, and make a graph of
acceleration down the plane vs angle of inclination. As the angle
approaches 90 deg (ie, vertical), the acceleration would approach that
of an object in free fall, the acceleration due to gravity, which can
be inferred from extrapolation on the graph. The inclined plane, in a
sense, "dilutes" the acceleration due to gravity so that motion may be
measured over the long time intervals available on a water clock of
that era. Great ideas! Thanks, Don!
10 October 2000 Don Kanner (Lane Tech HS)
showed us a "Test Tube Black Box." He held up a cardboard tube about 45
cm long and 7 cm in diameter. About 2 cm from the
left end, a string passed through the tube through a pair of
diametrically opposed holes. (On each end of the string were
small metal rings to prevent the string from coming free of the tube.)
Another string passed through the tube at its right end, in an
identical manner, except it was longer. Looking at us with a grin, Don
pulled down on the left string, and the string on the right end
shortened. When he pulled down on the right end string, the left end
string shortened. But then he pulled UP on the right end string
- and it moved straight up until it was stopped by its bottom ring. And
the left end string did not become shorter or move at all! How was this
possible!? After showing us again with some variations, Don
challenged us to come up with an explanation or make our own version.
He explained that a chemistry colleague at Lane Tech uses
this to catch the attention of his students and to make them put their
minds to work. So ... how about us!? Any ideas? Maybe Don
will show us more next time.
30 January 2001 Ann Brandon (Joliet West HS)
presented an exercise entitled Millikan's Eggs. The idea is to
determine how many plastic chickens [of identical mass] are inside each
plastic egg [plastic shells of identical mass, not counting the
chickens inside]. The students are to weigh each egg carefully,
and then organize the data in such a form (a bar graph is helpful) as
to determine the number of chickens and the mass of a chicken. If
an egg has n chickens, each of mass m, and if the
plastic shell has mass M, then the mass of that egg will be
Mass(n) = M + n ´ m .
This exercise is analogous to the analysis in Millikan's Oil Drop Experiment, to determine how many extra electrons are on an oil drop, and thereby the charge of one electron. The students found it surprisingly difficult to get started on the analysis.
27 March 2001 Don Kanner (Lane Tech HS, Physics)
mentioned a self-checking graph, associated with the Toilet
Flushing Experiment designed circa 20 years ago by Roy Coleman.
Working in pairs, students were asked to flush a toilet, and to record
the depth of water in the reservoir behind the toilet seat, as a
function of time, in intervals of roughly two seconds. Most
students got a graph like that appearing on the left below, which
resembles a check mark. Upon occasion, student teams would obtain
a graph like the one on the right below. Those students, who had
not followed instructions properly, were measuring water depth in
the wrong chamber!

01 May 2001 Estellvenia Sanders (Chicago Vocational HS) Teeing
for Angles
made a rectangle on the floor about 2 ft wide and 10 ft long using
masking tape. She marked the tape at 1 ft intervals. She then gave each
of three volunteers a toy plastic golf club and plastic ball. Each
volunteer was asked to putt the ball to see the distance it would go
before it either stopped or went out-of-bounds. A chart was drawn on
the board, with each person's name displayed on the vertical-axis, and
the distance on the horizontal-axis. Each distance was located as a dot
on the chart. Straight lines were drawn to connect each pair of dots on
the chart as data was obtained. The lines made various angles with each
other, which the we were asked to identify as obtuse, acute, right
angle, etc. A geometry vocabulary was thus motivated by this game:
angle, point, plane, line, etc. Estellvenia uses hand signing
to communicate with her deaf students, and this kind of activity proves
quite helpful. Thanks, Estellvenia!
25 September 2001 Ann Brandon (Joliet West HS, Physics)
Ann gave the following handout sheet of 4 graphs of distance versus
time D-T,
velocity versus time V-T, and acceleration versus time A-T.
Ann continued her presentation of the 11 September 2001 SMILE meeting, in which she dropped a transparent plastic tennis ball tube, with washers attached to its inside bottom end with rubber bands. Using the Video camera, Jami English carefully recorded the tube as it fell through the air, so we could see more clearly when and how the washers fell inside the tube. The following tentative conclusions were made:
These conclusions are tentative, pending examination of the video.
11 September 2001: Bill Shanks (Joliet Central HS,
retired)
began a presentation, but promptly discovered that the apparatus was
broken. He will do it next time.
*** The Answers: D, B, C ... C, A, A or D ... B, C, A or D ... A, D, B
06 November 2001:
Karlene Joseph (Lane Tech HS, Biology) A Measuring Activity
This activity is based on a fairly recent exercise in SMILE
Physics. The idea is, like Galileo in his inclined plane experiments,
to invent our own system of units. She passed out a thin dowel
about 6 inches or 15 cm in length. The length of
the stick is defined as one unit, and for reasons of personal
gratification Karlene named hers one Joseph ---
abbreviated as Jo. Karlene made this stick into a
ruler, and used it to estimate units to the nearest 0.1 Jo, or
tenth of Joseph. Other distances could be expressed in terms of Josephs;
for example, 1 my-unit » 1.4 Jo.
We then measured the lengths, widths, and diameters for other shapes, expressing the answers in Jo.
As an aid to measurement, Karlene had us hold our sticks at an angle across ruled notebook paper, so that one end was on a line, and the other end was lying exactly ten lines below it. We then marked the stick at each place where it crossed a line. This divided the stick into 10 equally spaced intervals, and we thus obtained a deci-Joseph (de-Jo) ruler. We then repeated the measurements described above, thereby estimating lengths with a precision of hundredths of a Joseph, or centi-Jo.
Next we calculated the areas of a rectangle, triangle, trapezoid, and circle, and expressed the answers in square-Josephs, or Jo2. What a beautiful set of mind-opening ideas for our students!
05 February 2002: Roy Coleman (Morgan Park HS, Physics) Various:
05 November 2002: John Bozovsky [Bowen
High School, Physics] Pushing a paper straw through a
potato
John described an experiment in which he pushed one end of an
ordinary
paper straw through a potato, after first putting his finger over the
other
end. Unless you close the other end, the trick will not
work. He
showed the experiment to his daughter, who said "I really hate
science in
school, but I love Physics!" Good point, John!
25 February 2003: Monica Seelman [St James
School] Surface
Tension with Cheerios
Monica has always enjoyed eating Cheerios™ cereal for
breakfast,
and was particularly fascinated by the fact that these pressed toroidal
cereal
pieces tend to clump while floating on milk. How come?
At Monica's
invitation, in groups
of 2, we put some milk into a bowl and began to add a few Cheerios,
which floated on the surface. Monica had expressed some
concern
that she had only been able to get 2% milk, versus her usual skim milk
at
breakfast, and wondered how it would work. We found that it
worked very
well, and that it worked at least as well, and possibly better, with
water. The cereal pieces floated on the surface until they came
close, and
then seemed to stick together along their edges. Presumably, the
surface energy,
which is proportion the surface perimeter between cereal and fluid, is
reduced
by having the cereal pieces to adhere. The same principles apply to
adhesion of
algae in a pond, clotting of blood, etc.
Very interesting --- even though you haven't been eating your Wheaties™, Monica!
25 March 2003: Ben Butler [Laura Ward Elementary School,
Science Teacher]
What's a Million?
Ben showed several exercises that he has presented to his students.
A good set of ideas, Ben!
25 March 2003: Don Kanner [Lane Tech HS,
Physics]
Proclamation Concerning Areas and Volumes
Don remarked that, because the lateral surface area of a
cylinder of radius R
and height H is A = 2 p
R H, whereas its volume is V = p
R2 H,
it should follow that the cylinder of greatest volume for a
given lateral area should be one of large
radius R and very small height H. Do you believe
this?
Don promised to prove it next time! We await edification, Don!
08 April 2003: Don Kanner [Lane Tech HS,
Physics] Paradox
and a Pair o' Docks
Don had remarked at the last meeting that, because the lateral
surface area of a cylinder of radius R
and height H is A = 2 p
R H, whereas its volume is V = p
R2 H,
it should follow that the cylinder of greatest volume for a
given lateral area should be one of large
radius R and very small height H.
To illustrate the point, Don placed three transparent
cylinders so they stood
upright on the table. One was tall and skinny; it was made from a
single
transparency sheet with its short side (width w) folded around
into a circle
(circumference w) and its long side (height H) standing
up. Its lateral area was
therefore H w. The second (medium) cylinder was only half as
tall, with height
H/2 and circumference 2w, and therefore lateral area of (H/2)
(2w) = Hw,
the same as the tall one. The third cylinder was short and squat,
half as high as the second one, with a height of H/4, and
circumference of
4w, and therefore a lateral area of (H/4) (4w) = Hw, the
same as the first two.
Don arranged them on the table to lie concentrically and coaxial
with each
other, ie., the tall one was surrounded
by the shorter medium one, which in turn was surrounded by the short
squat one,
all standing with a common vertical axis. Their bottom ends were closed
off by
the table, but their top ends were open. What next?
Don poured rice into the tall skinny cylinder in the center, filling it completely full to its very top. He pointed out that the volume of the rice must equal the volume of the tall skinny cylinder. Then -- beautiful to see! -- Don slowly and carefully raised the tall cylinder up off the table. As he did so, the rice spilled from its now open bottom end to occupy some of the volume within the medium cylinder. Don smoothed the rice flat, and we could see that it filled the medium cylinder to just half its volume. Wow! So the medium cylinder must be capable of holding twice the volume of rice as the tall skinny one! Finally, Don slowly raised the medium cylinder to spill the rice from its bottom end to occupy some of the volume enclosed within the short squat cylinder. When he smoothed the rice flat, we could see that it occupied just 1/4 of the volume of the short squat cylinder! Don then appealed to the fact that, if this process is continued indefinitely, the enclosed volume can be made arbitrarily large, as is illustrated in the following table, beginning with a sheet of height H and width w:
| Number | Height | Width / Circumference |
Lateral Surface Area |
Cylinder Radius R |
Cylinder Area pR2 |
Cylinder Volume pR2 H |
|
| 1 | H | w | H w | w / (2p) | w2/(4p) | w2/(4p) H | |
| 2 | H /2 | 2w | H w | w / p | w2/p | w2/(2p) H | |
| 3 | H / 4 | 4w | H w | 2w / p | 4 w2/p | w2 H / p | |
| 4 | H /8 | 8w | H w | 4w/ p | 16 w2/p | 2 w2 H/ p | |
| 5 | H / 16 | 16w | H w | 8w/ p | 64 w2/p | 4 w2 H/ p | |
| . . . | |||||||
| ¥ | 0 | ¥ | H a | ¥ | ¥ | ¥ | |
Don mentioned that zero and ¥ often occur together in physical problems; i.e, infinite resistance goes with zero current; infinite kinetic energy requires zero time elapsed; etc.
Don, you have done as promised! Very nice!
06 May 2003: Roy Coleman [Morgan Park HS,
Physics]
Using Marbles to Determine the Size
of the Monster Behind Door
Roy handed out a sheet containing the following information:
The Size of a Monster There is a very hungry monster in an almost completely closed room. There is a door to enter and a thin horizontal slit at the bottom along the entire length of a side. Before you enter the room you must determine the width of the monster. You also have a large supply of small rocks.Using a monster that looks remarkably like a soft drink can and rocks that look like marbles, you are to determine its experimental width and compare that value to its actual width. Each time the monster is hit it grumbles (klinks?) and moves, never touching any of the walls.
A couple of hints:
- Each group will need to throw at least 200 rocks randomly through the slit into the room.
- What is the probability of hitting the monster if it is half the size of the room?
- Look up information on the Rutherford Scattering experiment.
- Does the size of the rock itself make a difference?
Good luck in gauging the size of the monster, Roy. Thanks!
09 September 2003: Fred Farnell [Lane Tech HS,
physics]
Balancing an Egg on End
Fred began by describing this activity as an illustration of the
application
of the Scientific Method. He showed a dozen fresh eggs,
which he had asked
his class to vote on the following hypothesis concerning balancing an
egg on
end:
Choices: |
Number of Votes |
| Not possible | 45 |
| Only on vernal equinox | 34 |
| Only on autumnal equinox | 7 |
| Broad end only | 35 |
| Pointy end only | 1 |
| On either end | 10 |
| Only at equator | 1 |
Thanks for sharing this with us, Fred!
23 September 2003: Roy Coleman [Morgan Park HS,
physics]
Pulling on a Spool with a String
Roy brought in a very large wire spool [rough dimensions: outer
diameter
40 cm, inner diameter of 15 cm, height 40 cm].
He wrapped a
heavy cord around the inner portion, and went through the classic
demonstration
of pulling the cord, as described on the website Julien C Sprott:
Physics Demonstrations: Motion
[http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/demobook/chapter1.htm,
item 1.12]. He made the spool come toward him, go away from him,
stand still
and slip, and slide toward him, just by pulling with various
orientations of the
cord. Roy then rolled the gigantic spool on the chalk tray of
the board, attaching a
marker to the edge. The marker traced a cycloid on the board -- Beautiful!
Bigger spools are better, definitely! Neat, Roy!
Roy also called our attention to the American Association Physics Teachers [AAPT] High School Photo Contest, as described in the Fall 2003 issue of the AAPT Announcer [Vol 33, No 3]. [also, see the website http://www.aapt.org/Contests/pc03.cfm] The First Place winner by Jared Hill of Durham NC, is shown on its front cover. It shows a hard-boiled egg spinning in a thin layer of water. The water is creeping up the side of the egg until it is thrown outward, creating a fountain effect. See the journal article "Fluid flow up the Wall of a Spinning Egg" by Gutiérrez, Fehr, Calzadilla, and Figueroa, American Journal of Physics 66, 442-445 (May 1998). Our own Ann Brandon is a guiding spirit of this contest!
07 October 2003:
Robert Albert [Roosevelt HS,
science] Observation
and Inference
Robert took out a shopping bag filled with cubes made from empty
milk
cartons -- the cubes had one missing side where the carton tops had
been cut
off. Our cubes were similar, with the numbers 4 and 3 on
the front
and back sides, 1 and 6 on the left and right sides, and 5
on the bottom. All cubes were identical. Each person saw only
the numbers on one cube. We then
were asked to
seek a pattern, to predict what number should have been placed upon the
missing
face. We first saw only the numbers on the sides; since the cubes
were identical, each person had the same information in order to
extrapolate. These numbers represent observations, and it
might be
difficult to suggest a pattern. The possible pattern became more
evident when we
looked at the base, with 5 on it. It was suggested that
the sum of front-back, left-right, and up-down
numbers might be 7, since
4
+ 3 = 7, 1+ 6 = 7 and 2 + 5 = 7. The missing number [2]
could then be predicted from this inference. Of course, that
prediction cannot be confirmed until and unless we see the number on
the missing
side. So it goes with scientific analysis.
Next we replaced the numbers by names:
| Guess | Rationale |
| Nat | A name, opposite Mat |
| Pat | Another name |
| Pat | Letter spacing: b-c ... f-g-h ... m-n-o-p |
| Rat | An animal: bat cat rat |
| Sat | A fat (cat or bat) sat on a (hat or mat). |
Next set of cubes:
Robert uses this
exercise in class to highlight the difference in observations and
inferences.
You really made us think!
07 October 2003: Imara Abdullah [Douglas Academy,
science]
Posters
Imara provided us with poster paper, colored markers, and tape,
and asked each of
us to prepare a poster to illustrate some concept or process in
mathematics or
science. We came up with the following displays:
| Name | Display description | Concept or process illustrated |
| Porter Johnson | blank sheet of paper | Vacuum, empty space, cosmic void |
| Bill Colson | Flow chart 3 ® 1 | 3 conditions for triangle congruence |
| Roy Coleman | I'm a p r2 (big wheel) | Area and circumference of circle |
| Elizabeth Roombos | Rock hurled off cliff | Projectile motion |
| Marilynn Stone | Click-clack apparatus | Momentum conservation |
| Monica Seelman | 45°-45°-90° triangle | Pythagorean Theorem |
| Earl Zwicker | Sequential images of ball on inclined plane |
Galileo experiments in mechanics |
| Imara Abdullah | Walking dog around block | Perimeter |
| John Bozovsky | Kneeling carpenter drilling into wall | Niels Bohr (kneeling and boring) |
| Larry Alofs | Rectangle at new IIT student center | Golden rectangle -- or not? |
| Jane Shields | Colored strips on paper | Northern lights |
| Babatunde Taiwo |
Rocks thrown simultaneously up and down |
Do they hit the ground at the same time? |
| Walter McDonald | Headlight beam image | Illumination: Inverse square law |
| Rich Goberville | Projectile shot from cannon | Action-reaction Forces |
| Bill Shanks | Plumb bob demons | Universal gravitation |
| Fred Farnell | Light charged balls on strings | Coulomb's Law: Electrostatics |
| Leticia Rodriguez | See-through skeleton | Systems in human body |
| John Bozovsky | Truck accident | How the Mercedes bends |
04 November 2003: Monica Seelman [ST James Elementary School,
science]
How much paper is there in a roll?
Monica brought a wrapped cylindrical roll of paper about 1.36
meters
in height. The roll had an inner circumference of 11.6
cm, an
outer circumference of 23.6 cm, corresponding to an average
circumference
of 17.6 cm. The thickness of a stack of 25 sheets
was
measured to be 0.6 cm, corresponding 0.024 cm per sheet.
Since the
paper was 2.0 cm thick on the roll, Monica felt that
there were
about 83 sheets in the roll. Thus, she estimated the roll
to be 14.7
meters long --- and with a height of 1.36 meters, this
corresponds to an area of 20
square meters. Larry Alofs suggested an alternative
method of
estimating the amount of paper, by weighing a small piece of paper of
known
area, and then weighing the entire roll. This might have been
more accurate, in
practice. We could have done both, and then rolled the paper out
to see
how long it actually was.
Thanks for showing us the way, Monica!
18 November 2003:
Carol Giles [Collins
HS] INTERNET
EXPERIENCE
Carol
provided us with simulated internet research projects by
dividing us up in
triads, giving each group several "information sheets" on a specific
topic she had
obtained from surfing the net. She asked us to prepare an
overhead transparency
that one of the group members would present to all of us. The following
topics were
considered:
09 December 2003:
Brenda Daniel [Fuller Elementary
School]
Science Fair Materials + Scavenger Hunt
Brenda passed around an educators
MAP and other information obtained from the Museum of Science
and
Industry in Chicago [http://www.msichicago.org/].
Using
this information, she led us through two distinct exercises:
Very thought-provoking! Thanks, Brenda.
09 March 2004:
Wanda Pitts [Douglas Elem] Two
Sticklers by Terry Stickels [http://www.terrystickels.com/]
Wanda gave us these two puzzles that she has used in her fifth
grade
classes to stimulate interest in learning:
A: 8 triangles: ABC, ABD, ABE, ABF, ACD, AEF, BCF, BDE
06 April 2004: John Scavo [Evergreen Park HS,
Physics]
Cub Scout Science
John passed around copies of an article, Amazing Science Tricks
by Michio
Goto, which appeared in the April 2004 issue of Boy's
Life®
http://www.boyslife.org/,
official magazine of the Boy Scouts of America®. See
also the book
Amazing Science Tricks by Michio Goto: http://www.thejapanpage.com/html/book_directory/Detailed/329.shtml
. John called particular attention to the lessons
entitled Keeping
Water Separate, A Candle that Sucks Water, Bending
Light through
Water, and Toothpick Torpedo. He demonstrated the
bending of
light through water by poking a hole in a 2 liter soft drink bottle
with an awl,
and then filling it with water. When the bottle was placed on the
table (in
an aluminum oven pan!) in an upright position with the cap off, water
flowed out of the hole in a steady
stream. He held a flashlight at the level of the hole and on the
opposite
side of the bottle, and turned it on. Light shined through the
bottle, and
came out into the stream of water, and was totally reflected internally
along
the stream. Beautiful! He showed us the Toothpick
Torpedo.
First John dabbed a little shampoo on the blunt end of a
wooden
toothpick, and dropped the toothpick horizontally into a pan of water.
The toothpick began
moving in the direction of the sharp end. Why?
Shampoo
reduces the surface tension in the fluid near the blunt end of the
toothpick,
and thus the floating toothpick experiences an unbalanced force, and
goes
forward.
Isn't Science Amazing? Thanks, John
04 May 2004:
Joyce Bordelon [Moos Elementary
School] Simple
Machines
Joyce passed around some information on simple machines, which
contained patterns for each of the six simple machines --the inclined
plane, the
wedge, the lever, the wheel and axle, the pulley, and the screw.
These
template patterns could be cut out
and glued or taped together to make each of the machines. The
information
packet, Simple Machines, was prepared by Carmen O Pagán
and Lily T Reyes,
bilingual teachers at Talcott School. For more information see
the Simple
Machines Learning Site: http://www.coe.uh.edu/archive/science/science_lessons/scienceles1/finalhome.htm.We
discussed the simple machines that are found in various mechanical
systems in
the human body. Levers are present in the arms and the jaw, the
teeth
constitute a wedge, and ball-and-socket joints probably correspond to a
wheel
and axle system.
Interesting points, Joyce! Thanks!
04 May 2004:
Lilla Green [Hartigan Elementary School,
retired] A
Discovery Activity
Lilla fitted three volunteers with blindfolds, and
then gave them a series of items, which they tried to identify only by
touching
and feeling The first item, for example, was a clothespin.
Other
items were balloons, a small piece of play dough, a rubber band, and
various
paper clips. Lilla stated that the Shakers invented
the
clothespin. For more details see the Public Broadcasting Service
website The
Shakers for Educators: http://www.pbs.org/kenburns/shakers/educators/.
Lilla passed out a lesson plan for using clothespins in a
discovery activity, relating to their properties, their history, the
application
of simple machines in the design and construction of clothespins, and
other uses for
them. In particular, she described an exercise for using one or
more
clothespins, along with other materials, to design a useful tool, such
as a bag
closer or a recipe holder. As an extension, she suggested that
the anatomy
of a fish's mouth determines their food source. The fish has to
catch,
hold, chew, and swallow their food.
Very interesting ideas, Lilla!
07 December 2004: Sally Hill [Clemente
HS] Physics
Catapult Project (handout)
The following has been extracted from the handout passed out by Sally:
08 March 2005: Fred Schaal [Lane Tech HS,
mathematics]
RANDINT(1,14,4)+50
Fred used the Pseudo-random Number Generator RANDINT,
which is programmed into the TI-83 calculator.
He generated a random, equally-distributed set of 200 integers from 1
through 14, and obtained the following number-of-occurrences of the
generated numbers:
| Generated Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| Number-of-occurrences | 13 | 12 | 13 | 18 | 17 | 14 | 20 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 12 |
Porter Johnson mentioned that "everybody knows" that it is unlikely for a randomly flipped coin to come up H (Heads) ten times in a row. However, not everybody realizes that the alternating sequence H T H T H T H T H T is equally unlikely. Furthermore, it is quite unlikely that in 1000 coin flips, Heads will occur exactly 500 times.
For a general discussion of Pseudorandom Number Generators see the Wikipedia webpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudorandom_number_generator.
Fred also brought in his metal candy box, for which we had taken exterior measurements last time mp022205.html to determine a volume of about 910 cm3. We took a graduated cylinder filled with water, from which we were able to pour about 800 cm3 of water before the box became full. Our estimated volume was too large by over 10%. Why?
Fred also pointed out that the planet Mercury would be visible next to the New Moon just after sunset in the next few days. Thanks for the ideas, Fred!
10 May 2005: Roy Coleman appeared on the Channel 5 (NBC) news on Monday 09 May. His classroom work with college-bound students was shown on that program, in keeping with his wide-spread, well-deserved reputation as an excellent physics teacher. You looked great, Roy!
18 October 2005:
Betty Roombos (Gordon Tech HS,
physics)
Explore, Plan, and ACT
Betty recently proctored a pre-ACT Plan Test [http://www.act.org/plan/]
-- a practice test for the ACT that is often taken by 10th
graders.
Biology, weathering,
conservation of mass and water, wave-particle model with photoelectric
effect,
and centripetal force were among the topics covered.
Betty felt that this sophomore level test included topics beyond
what
the sophomores should be expected to know. She asked whether the
Plan Test was thus appropriate
for practice. Another concern
was that the students were not given enough time to reason out the
information in
the test -- which was given via complicated charts and graphs. Good
questions! Thanks, Betty.
15 November 2005: Don Kanner (Lane Tech HS,
physics)
Any Questions?
Don showed a strategy for getting class participation. He
handed out
a card to each student. When students asked a question or gave an
answer
(after being called on), he stamped their cards. At the end of
class, the
students put their names on their card, and Don collected
them. Each
stamp on the card was worth extra credit on a future examination.
Students
quickly took an interest in class discussion. Don
illustrated the
strategy using two balloons containing Helium gas. We
asked the
following questions:
24 January 2006: Don Kanner (Lane Tech,
physics)
Siphoning the net
Don gives students in his classes a chance to redeem themselves
over the
Christmas holidays. He asks them to write paragraphs on 26 items,
such as A: Atwood's Machine, and S: Siphon.
Students should also find a
picture describing the item, as a way of learning to use the internet.
As
examples of how such searching can lead to confusion and
misunderstanding,
Don showed a picture of a siphon found on the net, and the
explanation (text) at this site was riddled with spelling errors—not a
good example for kids. Two other sites had incorrect explanations of
how the siphon works. Cecil Adams
(http://www.straightdope.com/columns/010105.html)
had a rather complete explanation of how siphons work.
21 February 2006:
Roy Coleman (Morgan Park HS,
retired!)
Torques
Roy described a useful way to teach the right hand rule.
Tres simple, non! Thanks, Roy.
07 March 2006:
Bill Colson (Morgan Park HS,
math)
Assorted Literature
Bill shared several items with us:
Thanks, Bill!
18 April 2006: Benson Uwumarogie (Dunbar HS,
Mathematics)
Attempts to Improve Math Scores
Benson
has been attempting to help his students to obtain higher scores
on
standardized tests by assigning questions that are similar in spirit to
those
questions that were "frequently missed" on last years
examinations. The following is a paraphrase (diagrams not
included) of a frequently missed question:
A gardener installs 4 sprinklers (with each centered in the four quadrants) in a square plot with sides that are 12 feet long. Each sprinkler waters a circular region with a radius of 3 feet. No portion of the plot is watered by more than 1 sprinkler. What is the approximate area, in square feet, of the portion of the plot that is NOT watered by the sprinkler?This question is rather similar in character to the previous one:
In the doughnut shop, Fred is assigned to put sprinkles on the chocolate-covered doughnuts . There are 8 doughnuts on a tray, which don't touch one another. Each doughnut has a 4-inch diameter and a 1-inch hole. The tray is 20 inches long and 12 inches wide. Fred distributes sprinkles randomly and uniformly over the entire tray.This is a reasonable approach to a challenging problem. We hope it works well! Thanks Benson.
- What is the probability that a sprinkle with land on a doughnut? Explain.
- What is the probability that a sprinkle will land on the cookie sheet? How is this related to the probability in 1? Explain.
- If Fred distributes 4000 sprinkles over the cookie sheet, predict how many of them will land on the doughnut. Explain.
02 May 2006: Nneka Anigbogu (Jones College Prep,
math)
Math Ideas for Non-College
Prep Students
Nneka showed us a way to teach
exponential decay using M&Ms® or Skittles®!
We divided
into three groups, each with a small bag of M&M’s and a
medium sized plastic cup. We counted the number of candies
in our bag and put them into the cup (53-55 were the numbers
to start). Then we shook the cup and tossed the M&Ms
out (like dice) and counted the M&M’s with the M
showing
(heads up). The candy pieces that landed with the M up were
put back into the cup,
which was shaken and tossed once more. Again, about half of them
remained. We continued the process.
Here are the data recorded in tabular form for the groups:
| M&M's Toss | |||
| Trial Number | Group #1 | Group #2 | Group #3 |
| 1 | 53 | 55 | 54 |
| 2 | 29 | 25 | 21 |
| 3 | 14 | 08 | 16 |
| 4 | 05 | 08 | 07 |
| 5 | 00 | 04 | 02 |
| 6 | - | 02 | 01 |
| 7 | - | 01 | 00 |
| 8 | - | 00 | - |
She drew a graph of the number of M&M’s remaining versus the number of tosses, obtaining a profile that looked roughly exponential. She estimated the parameter r by using the formula Y2 = Y1 (1 - r), or
We obtained r = 0.45, 0.55, and 0.57 for the three cases -- the extrapolated numbers using these values of r being fairly close to the actual results.
For more candy games see the M&M's website: http://us.mms.com/us/fungames/games/. A good Phenomenological lesson -- edible too! Thanks, Nneka.